5711 results for "canc*"

in 52.50 milliseconds.

• WGS short read and 10X linked read sequencing of HR Deficient breast cancers

  A set of tumor/normal paired sequencing experiments, performed in short read WGS and 10X linked read whole genomes. BAM files aligned to hg19 are provided. Sample Alias number and Subject ID reflects patient of origin. T/N distinction discriminates between tumor and normal (peripheral blood) tissue.

  Dataset EGAD00001010326

• Colorectal cancer organoid-stroma biobank cohort

  In colorectal cancers (CRC) the tumor microenvironment plays a key role for prognosis and therapy efficacy. Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) show enormous potential for preclinical testing, however, purely epithelial cultures features including the ‘consensus molecular subtypes’ (CMS) are largely eradicated. To better reflect the cell type heterogeneity, we established the CRC organoid-stroma biobank of matched PDTOs and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) from 30 patients. Whole exome sequencing and transcriptome analysis in various in vitro and in vivo contexts was performed to study the influence of the TME on the CRC phenotype.

  Dataset EGAD00001011173

• Sequencing data from a phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary (CheCUP trial)

  Sequencing data from a phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary (CheCUP trial). Panel sequencing data from baseline FFPE biopsies were used to perform a comprehensive genomic profiling of CUP metastases. Combined targeted next-generation sequencing of patient-specific hotsport mutations and shallow whole genome sequencing of baseline and follow-up liquid biopsy samples were used to analyze ctDNA and to evaluate response to immunei checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In some cases, whole exome sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed to screen for potential CHIP and germline mutations.

  Dataset EGAD00001011130

• RNA sequencing of high-risk paediatric cancers for identifying T-cell infiltration signatures

  Transcriptome profiling of 121 high-risk paediatric cancer samples for identifying T-cell infiltration signatures using poly-A capture by Truseq and sequenced on NextSeq 500

  Dataset EGAD00001010920

• Cell-free DNA sequencing data of healthy control, atrophic gastritis, and gastric cancer patients’ blood

  Sample cohort (n=48) is consisted of healthy, atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer patients. Some of the gastric cancer patients samples are collected at the separate time points: -1 before the operation; -2 after the operation; -3 during the control visit. For the hybridisation capture of the genes unique 15 gastric cancer-related gene panel was developed and very deep sequencing using TruSight Oncology Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI) Reagents (Illumina) was used.

  Dataset EGAD00001011153

• Zero Childhood Cancer

  Dac EGAC00001001869

• Total RNA sequencing data from the Triple Negative Trial (TNT)

  BAM files from total RNA sequencing of samples from breast cancer patients in the TNT trial. Data includes 186 primary tumour samples and 13 matched recurrence samples.

  Dataset EGAD00001011141

• Sequencing data for oesophageal and related samples - Mourikis et al (WGS)

  Data supporting: "Patient-specific detection of cancer genes reveals recurrently perturbed processes in esophageal adenocarcinoma." Mourikis et al. WGS (BAM files) 521 samples

  Dataset EGAD00001004775

• Sequencing data for oesophageal and related samples - Mourikis et al (RNA)

  Data supporting: "Patient-specific detection of cancer genes reveals recurrently perturbed processes in esophageal adenocarcinoma." Mourikis et al. RNAseq (BAM files) 137 samples

  Dataset EGAD00001004776

• Sequencing data for ICGC / OCCAMS samples - Perner et al (WGS, sWGS, WES, mutREAD)

  Data supporting: "The mutREAD method detects mutational signatures from low quantities of cancer DNA." Perner et al. WGS, sWGS, WES, and reduced representation sequencing data tumour and normal samples BAM files

  Dataset EGAD00001006170

• Sequencing data for oesophageal and related samples - Katz-Summercorn, Jammula et al (RNA)

  Data supporting: “Multi-omic cross-sectional cohort study of pre-malignant Barrett’s esophagus reveals structural variation and retrotransposon activity occur early in cancer evolution.” Katz-Summercorn, Jammula et al. RNAseq (BAM files)

  Dataset EGAD00001006353

• WGS of HSPC clones of healthy individual sequenced with Illumina NovaSeq 6000

  Dataset contains WGS sequecing data from clonally expanded hematopoietic stem cells from 7 individual pediatric cancer patients. Samples were taken before (DX - diagnosis) or Follow-up (DX2/REM/FU - Diagnosis 2, remission or follow-up, respectively). In addtion, cord blood clones (Designated CB) treated with X-ray radiation, Cisplatin, Maphosphamide, Vincristine and Doxorubicin and untreated cord blood hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells were have been whole-genome sequenced. (Abbreviations RAD, CISPL, MAPH, VINC, DOX and CTRL, respectively)

  Dataset EGAD00001007078

• Sequencing data for oesophageal and related samples - OACs 496 release (WGS)

  Data from 496 OCCAMS (Oesophageal Cancer Clinical And Molecular Stratification) cases. WGS BAM files 496x oesophageal adenocarcinoma samples 496x normal samples

  Dataset EGAD00001007785

• WGS of a Li-Fraumeni patient's HSPCs

  WGS data of clonally expanded HSPCs from a Li-Fraumeni patient at the time of second cancer (Burkitt lymphoma and <5% t-MN) after primary osteosarcoma diagnosis and a reference MSC bulk.

  Dataset EGAD00001011257

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX063

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX063 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X3XB01584

  Dataset EGAD00001011268

• RCRF release 1

  Transcriptome sequencing from the Rare Cancer Research Foundation: leiomyosarcoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma

  Dataset EGAD00001010198

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0063_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0063_000 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X3XB01584

  Dataset EGAD00001011209

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX068

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX068 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X4XB03080

  Dataset EGAD00001011210

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX069

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX069 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X4XB03083

  Dataset EGAD00001011211

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X5XB03230

  Dataset EGAD00001011212

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X5XB03231

  Dataset EGAD00001011213

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X5XB03223

  Dataset EGAD00001011214

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X6XB03401

  Dataset EGAD00001011215

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X6XB03404

  Dataset EGAD00001011216

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X6XB03447

  Dataset EGAD00001011217

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X7XB03510

  Dataset EGAD00001011218

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X7XB03505

  Dataset EGAD00001011219

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X7XB03554

  Dataset EGAD00001011220

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0148_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0148_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X4XB02498

  Dataset EGAD00001011221

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX048

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX048 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X5XB02895

  Dataset EGAD00001011222

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_006

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_006 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X6XB03099

  Dataset EGAD00001011223

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X6XB03101

  Dataset EGAD00001011224

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X7XB03304

  Dataset EGAD00001011225

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X7XB03448

  Dataset EGAD00001011226

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X7XB03305

  Dataset EGAD00001011227

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_004

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_004 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X7XB03305

  Dataset EGAD00001011228

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03663

  Dataset EGAD00001011229

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X8XB03431

  Dataset EGAD00001011230

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03434

  Dataset EGAD00001011231

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03617

  Dataset EGAD00001011232

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03616

  Dataset EGAD00001011233

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0195_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0195_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03664

  Dataset EGAD00001011234

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X10XB03696

  Dataset EGAD00001011235

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X10XB03693

  Dataset EGAD00001011236

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0208_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0208_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03776

  Dataset EGAD00001011237

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X4XB02879

  Dataset EGAD00001011238

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0071_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0071_000 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X5XB03015

  Dataset EGAD00001011239

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0076_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0076_000 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X5XB03021

  Dataset EGAD00001011240

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X6XB03216

  Dataset EGAD00001011241

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035X6XB03211

  Dataset EGAD00001011242

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_004

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_004 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X6XB03209

  Dataset EGAD00001011243

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0145_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0145_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035X7XB03338

  Dataset EGAD00001011244

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0145_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0145_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035X7XB03340

  Dataset EGAD00001011245

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0162_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0162_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X7XB03502

  Dataset EGAD00001011246

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0151_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0151_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035X8XB03425

  Dataset EGAD00001011247

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0162_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0162_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X8XB03420

  Dataset EGAD00001011248

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035X8XB03631

  Dataset EGAD00001011249

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0164_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0164_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA530X3XB03295

  Dataset EGAD00001011250

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0014_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0014_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604X6XB01979

  Dataset EGAD00001011251

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0015_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0015_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604X6XB01979

  Dataset EGAD00001011252

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0019_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0019_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604X7XB02089

  Dataset EGAD00001011253

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0020_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0020_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604X8XB02164

  Dataset EGAD00001011254

• Germline genome sequencing samples from the Hereditary Cancer Syndromes (ICCon) Cancer Flagship

  A prospective study of individuals with suspicion of a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or was not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken.

  Dataset EGAD00001011260

• Cell-free DNA sequencing data of healthy control, atrophic gastritis, and gastric cancer patients’ blood

  Study EGAS00001007308

• RNAseq of primary mesothelioma cell lines

  Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer associated with previous exposure to asbestos and dismal prognosis. Since a pemetrexed/cisplatin combination was introduced for treatment of mesothelioma, no new first- or second-line therapies have been discovered. Thus, to better understand what drives mesothelioma carcinogenesis and to identify potential targets for therapy, in this project we aim at performing RNAseq analysis of a panel of mesothelioma cells lines.

  Dataset EGAD00001009642

• Recurrent DNMT3B gene rearrangements are associated with unfavorable outcome in dicentric (9;20)-positive pediatric BCP-ALL

  We provide clinical data sets of Array CGH, targeted RNA-seq, total RNA-seq, whole genome bisulfite (WGBS) and whole genome DNA sequencing (WGS) obtained from bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells of 57 pediatric patients with dicentric chromosome dic(9;20) positive Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), from which in 6 cases DNMT3B gene rearrangement was identified. This data is complemented by total RNA-seq and WGBS of samples from 4 additional ALL patients with a t(12;21) translocation and ETV6-RUNX1 gene fusion. DNA was isolated from BM or PB B-lymphocytes using Qiagen QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit to perform i) Array CGH of 58 dic(9;20) positive samples by hybridizing 500ng DNA using a Agilent 400K SurePrint G3 Custom CGH Human Genome Microarray (e-Array design 84704) ii) WGBS of 6 DNMT3B rearrangement positive samples and 4 ETV6-RUNX1 positive samples using Tecan TrueMethyl oxBS-Seq module for library preparation and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform to run 2x151 cycles iii) WGS of DNMT3B rearrangement positive samples using Illumina Lotus DNA Library Prep Kit followed by sequencing running 2x160 cycles on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. RNA was isolated from PB B-lymphocytes using the PerkinElmer Chemagic 360 instrument, followed by i) targeted RNA-seq of 56 dic(9;20) positive samples prepared using Illumina TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer Panel and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform running 2x75 cycles ii) total RNA-seq of 6 DNMT3B rearrangement positive samples and 4 ETV6-RUNX1 positive samples utilizing TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Gold kit and running 2x100 cycles on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform.

  Dataset EGAD00001011122

• Translation of non-canonical open reading frames as a cancer cell survival mechanism in childhood medulloblastoma - Ribo-Seq

  This study aims to investigate the dysregulation of RNA translation and identify functional non-canonical open reading frames (ORFs) as potential targets for medulloblastoma treatment. The study involves ribosome profiling and RNAseq of medulloblastoma tissues and cell lines to observe the translation of non-canonical ORFs. Multiple CRISPR-Cas9 screens will be used to identify functional non-canonical ORFs implicated in medulloblastoma cell survival.

  Dataset EGAD00001011193

• Cancer Genetics Data Access Commitee

  Dac EGAC00001001742

• Assessment of genomic copy number alterations in breast cancer

  The aim of this study was to assess genomic copy number alterations in a panel of breast cancer cell lines. These data were used to identify common aberrations associated with breast cancer, and also to identify aberrations associated with response to therapeutic compounds.

  Study EGAS00000000059

• Recurrent Somatic Mutations in CLL

  Study EGAS00001000070

• Genomic profiling of patient-derived xenografts and organoids in prostate cancer

  Study EGAS00001004673

• Molecular Classification of Hormone Sensitive and Castration Resistant prostate cancer, using non-negative matrix factorization molecular subtyping

  We aim to identify molecular subtypes of prostate cancer using consensus non-negative matrix factorization and correlate these with existing biomarkers to inform future immunotherapeutic strategies.

  Study EGAS00001006204

• Local In Time Statistics for processual research

  Background: Functional genomics in a processual analysis cover the time-dependent changes in transcriptomics and epigenetics before diagnosis of a disease, reflecting the changes in both life style and disease processes. The aim of this paper is to explore the dynamic, time-dependent mechanisms of the metastatic processes, using blood transcriptomics and including time in a continuous manner. For achieving this goal we develop new statistical methods based on statistics that are local in time. Methods: The new statistical method, Local In Time Statistics (LITS), is based on calculating statistics in moving windows and randomization. The method has been tested for the analysis of a dataset that collectively provides information on the blood transcriptome up to eight years before breast cancer diagnosis. The dataset from the NOWAC Post-genome Cohort consists of 467 case-control pairs matched on birth year and time of blood sampling. The data for a pair is the difference in log2 gene expression between the case and control. The stratified analyses are based on important biological differences like metastatic versus non-metastatic cancer, and the mode of cancer detection, i.e. screening detected versus clinically detected cancers. The dataset was used for examining whether the gene expression profile varies between cases and controls, with time, or between cases with and without metastases. Results: The null hypotheses of no differences between cases and controls, no time-dependent changes, and no differences between different strata were all rejected. For screening detected cancers the probability of correct prediction of metastasis status was best in year 1 before diagnosis compared to year 3 and 4 before diagnosis for clinically detected cancers. The predictor was not very sensitive to the number of genes included.Conclusions: Using a new statistical method, LITS, we have demonstrated time-dependent changes of the blood transcriptome up to eight years before breast cancer diagnosis.

  Study EGAS00001002520

• Signatures of mismatch repair deficiency in cancer genomes

  DNA replication errors occurring in mismatch repair (MMR) deficient cells persist as mismatch mutations and predispose to a range of tumors. Here, we sequenced the first whole-genomes from MMR-deficient tumors and observed that mutation rates were drastically increased relative to MMR-proficient endometrial tumors.

  Study EGAS00001000182

• Whole-exome sequencing reveals the origin and evolution of Hepato-Cholangiocarcinoma

  Hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (H-ChC) is a rare subtype of liver cancer with clinicopathological features of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). To date, molecular mechanisms underlying the co-existence of HCC and iCCA components in a single tumor remain elusive. Here we show that H-ChC samples contain substantial private mutations from WES analyses, ranging from 33.1% to 86.4%, indicative of substantive intratumor heterogeneity (ITH). However, on the other hand, numerous ubiquitous mutations shared by HCC and iCCA suggest the monoclonal origin of H-ChC. Mutated genes identify herein e.g. VCAN, ACVR2A and FCGBP are speculated to contribute to distinct differentiation of HCC and iCCA within H-ChC. Moreover, immunohistochemistry demonstrate that EpCAM is highly expressed in 80% of H-ChC implying the stemness of such liver cancer. In summary, our data highlight the monoclonal origin and stemness of H-ChC, as well as substantial intratumoral heterogeneity.

  Study EGAS00001002783

• Transcriptomic profiling of patient-derived xenografts and organoids in prostate cancer

  Study EGAS00001004675

• RNA Sequencing of Colorectal Liver Metastases

  A subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer achieves prolonged survival after hepatic resection of limited liver metastases. Here, we examined the molecular features of colorectal liver metastases as they relate to clinical outcomes.

  Study EGAS00001002945

• _WGS__Somatic_mutation_in_skin_epidermis__SMS_

  Previously we have sequenced 2mm2 biospies of human epithelia at high depth using a custom bait set. This has identified a range of mutations. Some of the biospies are predicted to be clonal and we would like to perform WGS to give an insight into mutational burden, and CNV which may be associated with these mutations.

  Study EGAS00001004464

• whole-genome sequencing of gastric cancer

  Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers. Genome-wide analysis of genomic signatures might reveal novel mechanisms for gastric cancer tumorigenesis. Here, we analyzed structural variations and mutational signatures via whole-genome sequencing of 168 gastric cancer samples. Our data demonstrates diverse models of complex structural variations operative in GC, which lead to high-level amplification of oncogenes.

  Study EGAS00001003512

• Coverage bias and sensitivity of variant calling for four whole-genome sequencing technologies

  Massively parallel sequencing has revolutionized research in cancer genetics and genomics and enhanced our understanding of natural human genetic variation. Recently, Lam et al. have performed a detailed comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies with respect to their sensitivity to call single nucleotide variants (SNV) and indels. Here, we sequenced two tumor/normal pairs obtained from two paedriatic medulloblastoma patients with Life Technologies’ SOLiD 4 and 5500xl SOLiD, Illumina’s HiSeq2000, and Complete Genomics’ technology. We then compared their ability to call SNVs with high confidence. As gold standard for SNV calling, we used genotypes determined by an Affymetrix SNP array. Additionally, we performed a detailed analysis of how evenly each technology covers the genome and how the reads are distributed across functional genomic regions. Finally, we studied how a combination of data from different technologies might help to overcome the limitations in SNV calling by any of the four technologies alone.

  Study EGAS00001000274

• WGS_skin_punches

  We wish to understand the degree of copy number alterations in normal human sun exposed skin. We have collected small punches of epithelia and using a bait set design have shown the these span a clone. WGS will provide copy number information on these.

  Study EGAS00001004465

• Quantification of chromosomal copy number aberrations by shallow whole-genome sequencing

  Detection of DNA copy number aberrations by shallow whole-genome sequencing (WGS) faces many challenges including lack of completion and errors in the human reference genome, repetitive sequences, polymorphisms, variable sample quality, and biases in the sequencing procedures.Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival material, the analysis of which is important for studies of cancer, presents particular analytical difficulties due to degradation of the DNA and frequent lack of matched reference samples. We present a robust, cost-effective WGS method for DNA copy number analysis that addresses these challenges more successfully than currently available procedures. In practice very useful profiles can be obtained with 0.1 fold genome coverage. We improve on previous methods by; first, implementing a combined correction for sequence mappability and GC content, and second, applying this procedure to sequence data from the 1000 Genomes Project in order to develop a blacklist of problematic genome regions. A small subset of these blacklisted regions were previously identified by ENCODE, but the vast majority are novel unappreciated problematic regions. Our procedures are implemented in a pipeline called QDNAseq. We have analyzed over 1,000 samples, most of which were obtained from the fixed tissue archives of over 25 institutions.We demonstrate that for most samples our sequencing and analysis procedures yield genome profiles with noise levels near the statistical limit imposed by read counting. The described procedures also provide better correction of artifacts introduced by low DNA quality than prior approaches, and better copy number data than high-resolution microarrays at substantially lower cost.

  Study EGAS00001000642

• Frequent mutation of the FOXA1 untranslated region in prostate cancer

  We sequenced the coding and untranslated regions of 72 prostate cancer driver genes in 712 plasma cell free DNA samples from 428 men with metastatic prostate cancer, in an effort to understand the role of untranslated region mutations in late stage prostate cancer.

  Study EGAS00001003113

• Inhibiton of the GABPB1L-containing GABP tetramer is sufficient to reverse replicative immortality in TERT promoter mutant glioblastoma cells.

  Over 50 types of cancer acquire TERT promoter mutations. These single point mutations reactivate telomerase, allowing for indefinite maintenance of telomere length and enabling cellular immortalization. The transcription factor binding site created by the point mutations specifically recruit the ETS factor GABP, a multimeric transcription factor composed of the GABPα and GABPβ subunits. GABP can form two functionally independent transcription factor species – a dimer or a tetramer – depending on which of the structurally distinct GABPβ isoforms is incorporated into the complex. In this study, we show that genetic disruption of GABPβ1L, a tetramer forming isoform of GABPβ that is dispensable in normal development, results in TERT silencing in a TERT promoter mutation dependent manner. Failure to activate TERT expression by GABPβ1L culminates in telomere dysfunction, DNA damage, and mitotic cell death exclusively in TERT promoter mutant cells. Furthermore, exogenous expression of TERT is sufficient to prevent telomere degradation and loss of cell viability in GABPβ1L-reduced lines bearing the mutant TERT promoter. Orthotopic injection of tetramer-deficient mutant TERT promoter GBM cells rendered lower tumor burden and prolonged the overall survival of the tumor-bearing mice. These results highlight the potentially widespread role of GABPB1L in enabling replicative immortality of TERT promoter cancers.

  Study EGAS00001002582

• Institut Curie Neuroblastoma Whole Genome Sequencing Diagnosis Relapse

  Neuroblastoma, a clinically heterogeneous pediatric cancer, is characterized by distinct genomic profiles but few recurrent mutations. As neuroblastoma is expected to have high degree of genetic heterogeneity, study of neuroblastoma's clonal evolution with deep coverage whole-genome sequencing of diagnosis and relapse samples will lead to a better understanding of the molecular events associated with relapse. Samples were included in this study if sufficient DNA from constitutional, diagnosis and relapse tumors was available for WGS. Whole genome sequencing was performed on trios (constitutional, diagnose and relapse DNA) from eight patients using Illumina Hi-seq2500 leading to paired-ends (PE) 90x90 for 6 of them and 100x100 for two. Expected coverage for sample NB0175 100x100bp was 30X for tumor and constitutional samples. For the seven other patients expected coverage was 80X for tumor samples with PE 100x100, 100X in the other tumor samples and 50X for all constitutional samples (see table 1). Following alignment with BWA (Li et al., Oxford J, 2009 Jul) allowing up to 4% of mismatches, bam files were cleaned up according to the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) recommendations (Van der Auwera et al., Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 2013, picard-1.45, GenomeAnalysisTK-2.2-16). Variant calling was performed in parallel using 3 variant callers: GenomeAnalysisTK-2.2-16, Samtools-0.1.18 and MuTect-1.1.4 (McKenna et al., Genome Res, 2010; Li et al., Oxford J, 2009 Aug; Cibulskis et al., Nature, 2013). Annovar-v2012-10-23 with cosmic-v64 and dbsnp-v137 were used for the annotation and RefSeq for the structural annotation. For GATK and Samtools, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with a quality under 30, a depth of coverage under 6 or with less than 2 reads supporting the variant were filter out. MuTect with parameters following GATK and Samtools thresholds have been used to filter our irrelevant variants. .SNVs within and around exons of coding genes overlapping splice sites.. Then,variants reported in more than 1% of the population in the 1000 genomes (1000gAprl_2012) or Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500) have been discarded in order to filter polymorphisms. Finally, synonymous variants were filtered out. MuTect focuses on somatic by filtering with constitutional sample. Mpileup comparison between constitutional and somatic DNAs allowed us to focus also on tumor specific SNVs with GATK and Samtools. Finally, every SNV called by our pipeline and also supported in any constitutional samples were filtered our in order to prevent putative constitutional DNA coverage deficiency. Then we analyzed CNVs (copy number variants) with HMMcopy-v0.1.1 (Gavin et al., Genome Res, 2012) and control-FREEC-v6.7 (Boeva et al., Bioinformatics 2011) with a respective window of 2000bp and 1000 bp, and auto-correction of normal contamination of tumor samples for Control-FREEC. Finally we explored Structural variants (SVs) including deletions, inversions, tandem duplications and translocations using DELLY-v0.5.5 with standard parameters (Rausch et al., Oxford J, 2012). In tumors, at least 10 supporting reads were required to make a call and 5 supporting reads for the sample NB0175 with a coverage of only 40X (see table 2). To predict SVs in constitutional samples for subsequent somatic filtering, only 2 supporting reads were required in order not to miss one. To identify somatic events, all the SVs in each normal sample were first flanked by 500 bp in both directions and any SVs called in a tumor sample which was in the combined flanked regions of respective normal sample was removed (see graph 1). Deletions with more than 5 genes impacted or larger than 1Mb and inversions or tandem duplications covering more than 4 genes, were removed. We focused on exonic and splicing events for deletions, inversions, and tandem duplications. For translocation, we keep all SVs that occurred in intronic, exonic, 5'UTR, upstream or splicing regions. Bioinformatics detection of variations with Deep sequencing approach Once PE reads merged and adaptors trimmed by SeqPrep with default parameters, merged reads were aligned via the BWA (Li H. and Durbin R. 2009 PMID 19451168) allowing up to 1 differences in the 22-base-long seeds and reporting only unique alignments. Only reads having a mapping quality 20 or more have been further analysed. Variant calling software was not used, since we aimed to predict variations at low frequencies, observed in less than 1% of reads. Such variants require a custom approach. Using DepthOfCoverage functions of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v2.13.2 (McKenna A, et al., 2010 Genome Research PMID: 20644199), we focused on high quality coverage of bases A, C, G and T at the targeted variant position. Depth of coverage of each base following a mapping quality higher than 20 and a base quality higher than 10 have been taken into account in order to focus only on high quality data. Aiming to determine the background level of variability at the studied regions, 10 control samples were included in the analysis. The same approach and filtering criteria have been applied as introduced above over the entire amplicons. In order to highlight variants, for each sample the frequencies of each bases at each amplicon position were then compared to those observed in the set of controls. Statistical analyses were performed with the R statistical software (http://www.R-project.org). Fisher’s exact two-sided tests with a Bonferroni correction were performed to compare percentages of bases between the data sets, i.e. for a given base between a case and the controls. Finally, significant variations were filtered-in once (i) a significant increase in the percentage of avariant base and (ii) a significant decrease in the percentage of it's reference base following our p.values criteria was observed (p.val < 0.05).

  Study EGAS00001001184

• 65 prostate cancer cases WGS and transcriptome sequencing project

  We obtained whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of tumor-benign pairs from 65 Asian prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Taken together with the TCGA PCa cohort, our integration analysis provides the first comprehensive mutational landscape of PCas across major ethnics worldwide and reveals potential novel role of frequent altered chromatin remodeler genes in PCas without androgen receptor (AR) alteration and complex rearrangements derived from Chromoplexy. In addition, we identified 5 putative tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) chains including one on chromosome 13q with novel findings of PCDH9 (deletions in 15/65 tumors) which was implicated in aggressive progression of prostate cancer. Finally, the integrative pathway and co-expression network analysis followed by the functional study indicated the frequent altered genes, particularly focal amplifications of PLXNA1 (11/65), in semaphoring signaling of axon guidance pathway may interact with PI3K/AKT and AR signaling and also contribute to the aggressiveness and progression of prostate cancer.

  Study EGAS00001000888

• EORTC RP1335 SPECTA Lung cancer data

  SPECTAlung has recruited patients with thoracic malignancies, collecting FFPE material for molecular analysis. Illumina TST170 NGS panel was used for sequencing. The goal was to identify patients for whom a personalized treatment was possible and build a clinically-annotated molecular database for thoracic patients.

  Study EGAS00001004485

• Signatures of Aristolochic Acid Mutagenesis in Bladder Cancer

  This study looks at signatures of Aristolochic Acid mutagenesis in bladder cancer, based on exome and whole genome sequencing data. Thirteen bladder tumors and their matched normal DNAs were sequenced on Illumina platforms. Among them eleven were exome sequenced and two were whole genome sequenced.

  Study EGAS00001000975

• Whole exome sequencing for gallbladder cancer in Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine

  Patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), the most aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract, have a poor prognosis. Here, we report our identification of somatic mutations of GBCs in 57 tumor-normal pairs by use of a combination of exome sequencing and ultra-deep sequencing of cancer-related genes. The mutation pattern is defined by a dominative prevalence of C>T mutations at TCN sites. Genes with a significant frequency of non-silent mutations include TP53 (47.1%), KRAS (7.8%), and ERBB3 (11.8%). Moreover, ErbB signaling (including EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ERBB4 and their downstream genes) is the most extensively mutated pathway, affecting 36.8% (21 of 57) of the GBC samples. Multivariate analyses further reveal that patients with ErbB pathway mutations have a worse outcome (P = 0.001). These findings provide insight into the somatic mutational landscape in GBC and highlight the key role of the ErbB signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of GBCs.

  Study EGAS00001000853

• Chromatin immunoprecipitation linked to next-generation whole genome sequencing (ChIP-Seq) for H3K36me3 in paediatric high grade glioma cell lines KKNS4 and SF188 with and without a G34V mutation in H3F3A

  Glioblastomas of children and young adults have a median survival of only 12-15months and are clinically and biologically distinct from histologically similar cancers in older adults1. They are defined by highly specific mutations in the gene encoding the histone H3.3 variant H3F3A2, occurring either at or close to key residues marked by methylation for regulation of transcription – K27 and G34. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation linked to next-generation whole genome sequencing (ChIP-Seq) for H3K36me3 in order to test the hypothesis that, rather than total H3K36me3, the G34V mutation may instead result in differential binding of the trimethyl mark throughout the genome. Compared with H3F3A wild-type SF188 paediatric GBM cells, H3K36me3 was found to be significantly differentially bound in KNS42 cells at 5130 distinct regions of the genome corresponding to 156 genes. Concurrent whole genome DNA sequencing demonstrated that this was not confounded by copy number alterations. The cerebral hemispheric-specific G34 mutation drives a distinct expression signature through differential genomic binding of the K36 trimethylation mark (H3K36me3). The transcriptional program induced recapitulates that of the developing forebrain, and involves numerous markers of stem cell maintenance, cell fate decisions and self-renewal. Critically, H3F3A G34 mutations cause profound upregulation of MYCN, a potent oncogene which is causative of glioblastomas when expressed in the correct developmental context. This driving aberration is selectively targetable in this patient population by inhibiting kinases responsible for stabilisation of the protein.

  Study EGAS00001001437

• Molecular characterization of a renal cell carcinoma PDX cohort

  Study EGAS00001006249

• CAGEKID: Cancer Genomics of the Kidney - Targeted Sequencing

  The aim of CAGEKID is to carry out comprehensive detection of DNA markers for conventional (clear cell) renal carcinoma. The project includes complete analysis of somatic and constitutional DNA variation, methylation patterns and expression in a large number of constitutional/tumor pairs. CAGEKID is a part of the International Cancer Genome Consortium, ICGC.

  Study EGAS00001007004

• Fixative optimisation study for BRITROC project

  The British Translational Research Ovarian Cancer Collaborative (BriTROC), spanning more than 10 centres across UK, is a prospective observational project focused on relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The first study, as a part of the project, is the Fixative optimisation study, which analyses the utility for next-generation sequencing of UMFIX samples compared to NBF-fixed and fresh frozen samples. Various DNA and sequencing quality analyses were performed to compare fixation methods in bulk tumour and biopsy samples.

  Study EGAS00001001433

• Systematic kinase inhibitor profiling identifies CDK9 as a synthetic lethal target in NUT midline carcinoma

  Kinase inhibitors represent the backbone of targeted cancer therapy, yet only a limited number of oncogenic drivers are directly druggable. By interrogating the activity of 1,505 kinase inhibitors we found that BRD4-NUT-rearranged NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) cells are specifically killed by CDK9 inhibition (CDK9i) and exhibit a unique dependency on CDK9 and Cyclin-T1 expression. We show that CDK9i leads to robust induction of apoptosis and of markers of DNA damage response in NMC cells. While both CDK9i and bromodomain inhibition over time result in reduced Myc protein expression, only bromodomain inhibition induces cell differentiation and a p21-induced cell cycle arrest in these cells. Finally, RNA-Seq and ChIP-based analyses reveal a BRD4-NUT specific CDK9i-induced perturbation of transcriptional elongation. Thus, our data provide a mechanistic basis for the genotype-dependent vulnerability of NUT midline carcinoma cells to CDK9i that may be of relevance for the development of targeted therapies for NMC patients.

  Study EGAS00001002588

• High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas Originate in the Fallopian Tube

  High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent type of ovarian cancer and has a poor outcome. It has been proposed that fallopian tube cancers may be precursors of HGSOC but evolutionary evidence for this hypothesis has been limited. To provide insights into the origins of HGSOC, we We performed whole-exome sequence and copy number analyses of laser-capture microdissected fallopian tube lesions (p53 signatures, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs), and fallopian tube carcinomas), ovarian cancers, and metastases from nine patients with HGSOC. The majority of tumor-specific sequence and structural alterations in ovarian cancers were present in STICs, including those affecting TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2 or PTEN genes. An eEvolutionary analyseis revealed that p53 signatures and STICs were are the precursors of ovarian carcinoma which in turn gave rise to metastatic lesionsand identify a. In one patient we identified a second STIC as a metastasis in the fallopian tube opposite from the affected ovary. These analyses revealed a window of seven years between the development of a STIC and the initiation of ovarian carcinomas, with development of metastases following rapidly thereafter. Our results provide insights into the etiology of ovarian cancer and have implications for the prevention, early detection and therapeutic intervention of this disease.

  Study EGAS00001002589

• The subclonal architecture of metastatic breast cancer: Results from a prospective community-based rapid autopsy program 'CASCADE'

  Background: Understanding the cancer genome is seen as a key step in improving outcomes for cancer patients. Genomic assays are emerging as a possible avenue to personalised medicine in breast cancer. The majority of work in this area has targeted primary tumours however, and very few studies have performed comprehensive profiling of advanced disease. Evolution of the cancer genome during the natural history of breast cancer is largely unknown, as is the profile of disease at death. We sought to study in detail these aspects of advanced breast cancers that have resulted in lethal disease. Methods and Findings: Three patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and one patient with triple negative breast cancer underwent rapid autopsy as part of an institutional prospective community-based rapid autopsy program. Cases represented a range of management problems in breast cancer, including late relapse after early stage disease; de novo metastatic disease; discordant disease response and disease refractory to treatment. Between 5 and 12 metastatic sites were collected at autopsy together with available primary tumours and longitudinal metastatic biopsies taken during life. Samples underwent paired tumour-normal whole exome sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Subclonal architectures were inferred by jointly analysing all samples from each patient. Mutations were validated using high depth amplicon sequencing.Between cases, there were significant differences in mutational burden, driver mutations, mutational processes and copy number variation. Within each case, we found dramatic heterogeneity in subclonal structure from primary to metastatic disease and between metastatic sites, such that no single lesion captured the breadth of disease. Metastatic cross seeding was found in each case and treatment drove subclonal diversification. Subclones displayed parallel evolution of treatment resistance in some cases, and apparent augmentation of key oncogenic drivers as an alternative resistance mechanism. We also observed the key role of mutational processes in subclonal evolution.Limitations of this study include the potential for bias introduced by joint analysis of formalin fixed archival specimens with fresh specimens, and the difficulties in resolving subclones with whole exome sequencing. Other alterations that could define subclones such as structural variants or epigenetic modifications were not assessed. Conclusions: This study highlights the variety of mechanisms that shape the genome of metastatic breast cancer, and the value of studying advanced disease in detail. Treatment drives significant genomic heterogeneity in breast cancers which has implications for disease monitoring and treatment selection in the personalised medicine paradigm.

  Study EGAS00001002153

• Genomic landscape of oral cancers (Complete Genomics WGS)

  Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary but insufficient cause of a subset of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) that is increasing markedly in frequency. To identify contributory, secondary genetic alterations in these cancers, we used comprehensive genomics methods to compare 149 HPV-positive and 335 HPV-negative OSCC tumor/normal pairs. Different behavioral risk factors underlying the two OSCC types were reflected in distinctive genomic mutational signatures. In HPV-positive OSCC, the signatures of APOBEC cytosine deaminase editing, associated with anti-viral immunity, were strongly linked to overall mutational burden. By contrast, in HPV-negative OSCC, T>C substitutions in the sequence context 5’-ATN-3’ correlated with tobacco exposure. Universal expression of HPV E6*1 and E7 oncogenes was a sine qua non of HPV-positive OSCC. Significant enrichment of somatic mutations was confirmed or newly identified in PIK3CA, KMT2D, FGFR3, FBXW7, DDX3X, PTEN, TRAF3, RB1, CYLD, RIPK4, ZNF750, EP300, CASZ1, TAF5, RBL1, IFNGR1 and NFKBIA. Of these, many affect host pathways already targeted by HPV oncoproteins, including the p53 and pRB pathways, or disrupt host defenses against viral infections, including interferon and nuclear factor-B signaling. Frequent copy number changes were associated with concordant changes in gene expression. Chr. 11q (including CCND1) and 14q (including DICER1 and AKT1) were recurrently lost in HPV-positive OSCC, in contrast to their gains in HPV-negative OSCC. High-ranking variant allele fractions implicated ZNF750, PIK3CA and EP300 mutations as candidate driver events in HPV-positive cancers. We conclude that virus-host interactions cooperatively shape the unique genetic features of these cancers, distinguishing them from their HPV-negative counterparts.

  Study EGAS00001002393

• Large scale familial CRC exome sequencing study

  The burden of rare disruptive mutations to the heritable risk of colorectal cancer

  Study EGAS00001001666

• Comparison of HCC cell lines and primary HCCs

  There are concerns about whether cancer cell lines could faithfully represent the matched primary cancer cells. Comparison of the HCC cell lines and primary HCCs demonstrated that, during long-term in vitro culture, cell lines retain the genetic landscape of the matched primary HCCs.

  Study EGAS00001001678

• Whole exome sequencing on primary retinoblastoma tissues and matching lymphocyte DNA.

  Retinoblastoma is a rare childhood cancer initiated by RB1 mutation or MYCN amplification, while additional alterations may be required for tumor development. However, the view on single nucleotide variants is very limited. To better understand oncogenesis, we determined the genomic landscape of retinoblastoma. We performed exome sequencing of 71 retinoblastomas and matched blood DNA. Next, we determined the presence of single nucleotide variants, copy number alterations and viruses. Aside from RB1, recurrent gene mutations were very rare. Only a limited fraction of tumors showed BCOR (7/71, 10%) or CREBBP alterations (3/71, 4%). No evidence was found for the presence of viruses. Instead, specific somatic copy number alterations were more common, particularly in patients diagnosed at later age. Recurrent alterations of chromosomal arms often involved less than one copy, also in highly pure tumor samples, suggesting within-tumor heterogeneity. Our results show that retinoblastoma is among the least mutated cancers and signify the extreme sensitivity of the childhood retina for RB1 loss. We hypothesize that retinoblastomas arising later in retinal development benefit more from subclonal secondary alterations and therefore, these alterations are more selected for in these tumors. Targeted therapy based on these subclonal events might be insufficient for complete tumor control.

  Study EGAS00001001690