9296 results for "cancer rna-seq"

in 48.48 milliseconds.

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007405

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007406

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007407

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC01 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC01 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007408

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007409

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007410

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007411

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007412

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007413

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007414

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC02 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC02 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007415

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007416

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007417

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007424

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007425

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007426

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007427

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC03 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC03 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007428

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007429

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007430

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007431

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007432

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007433

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007434

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007435

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007436

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007437

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007438

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007439

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007440

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007441

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC01 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC01 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007442

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007443

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007444

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007445

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007446

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007447

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007448

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-iPSC02 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-iPSC02 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007449

• Intellance-2: TruSight Tumor 170 panel based DNA-seq

  Intellance-2: TruSight Tumor 170 panel based DNA-seq

  Dataset EGAD00001007945

• Patient data used in FLTseq paper

  Apply newly developed FLT-seq protocol and package FLAMES on a primary patient sample

  Study EGAS00001005597

• A Single Cell Atlas of Gene Regulatory Elements in the Human Heart

  Background: Cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers and promoters are crucial for directing gene expression in the human heart. Dysregulation of these elements can result in many cardiovascular diseases that are major leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In addition, genetic variants associated with cardiovascular disease risk are enriched within cis-regulatory elements. However, the location and activity of these cis-regulatory elements in individual cardiac cell types remains to be fully defined. Methods: We performed single nucleus ATAC-seq and single nucleus RNA-seq to define a comprehensive catalogue of candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) and gene expression patterns for the distinct cell types comprising each chamber of four non-failing human hearts. We used this catalogue to computationally deconvolute dynamic enhancers in failing hearts and to assign cardiovascular disease risk variants to cCREs in individual cardiac cell types. Finally, we applied reporter assays, genome editing, and electrophysiogical measurements in in vitro differentiated human cardiomyocytes to validate the molecular mechanisms of cardiovascular disease risk variants. Results: We defined >287,000 candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) in human hearts at single-cell resolution, which notably revealed gene regulatory programs controlling specific cell types in a cardiac region/structure-dependent manner and during heart failure. We further report enrichment of cardiovascular disease risk variants in cCREs of distinct cardiac cell types, including a strong enrichment of atrial fibrillation variants in cardiomyocyte cCREs, and reveal 38 candidate causal atrial fibrillation variants localized to cardiomyocyte cCREs. Two such risk variants residing within a cardiomyocyte-specific cCRE at the KCNH2/HERG locus resulted in reduced enhancer activity compared to the non-risk allele. Finally, we found that deletion of the cCRE containing these variants decreased KCNH2 expression and prolonged action potential repolarization in an enhancer dosage-dependent manner. Conclusion: This comprehensive atlas of human cardiac cCREs provides the foundation for not only illuminating cell type-specific gene regulatory programs controlling human hearts during health and disease, but also interpreting genetic risk loci for a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

  Study phs002204

• Characterization of genetic intratumor heterogeneity in colorectal cancer and matching patient-derived spheroid cultures.

  Patient-derived in vitro cultures of colorectal cancer (CRC) may help guide treatment strategies prior to patient treatment. However, most previous studies have been performed on a single biopsy per tumor. The purpose of this study was to analyze multiple spatially distinct biopsies from CRCs and see how well intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) was recapitulated in matching patient-derived spheroids. Three to five biopsies were collected from six CRC tumors. Each biopsy was split in two; one half was used for spheroid culturing, the other half was used for direct DNA and RNA purification. For two of the patients, lymph node metastases were analyzed. Somatic mutations were called from whole exome sequencing data. Each tumor contained multiple mutations shared across all biopsies and spheroids, including major CRC drivers such as APC, KRAS, and TP53. At the same time, all tumors exhibited ITH on both mutation and copy number level. The concordance between biopsies and spheroids ranged between 40-70% for coding mutations. For three of the patients the biopsy and spheroid from matching areas clustered together, meaning that the spheroid resembled the area of origin more than the other areas. However, all biopsies and spheroids contained private mutations. Thereby, multiple cultures from spatially distinct sites of the tumor increase the insight into the genetic profile of the entire tumor. RNA sequencing based molecular subtyping was stable and seemed independent of genetic ITH. In conclusion, all examined CRC tumors contained genetic ITH on mutation and copy number level. Spheroid cultures partly reflected this ITH, meaning that multiple cultures from distinct sites of the tumor improved the representation of the different genetic subclones in the primary tumor. This should be taken in to account when establishing patient-derived models for drug screening.

  Study EGAS00001002684

• Whole Genome Sequencing of a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patient: Matched Primary Tumor, Normal, Metastasis and Xenograft samples

  Breast Cancer Subject Participant ID 700064 (Source Sample names: 6888 and 206). We used massively parallel DNA sequencing technologies to screen entire genomes, in an unbiased manner, for genetic changes associated with tumor growth and metastasis. We describe the complete genome sequence analysis of four DNA samples from a 44-year old African-American patient with basal-like breast cancer: peripheral blood, the primary tumor, a brain metastasis that developed within a year of initial therapy, and a first-passage xenograft derived from the primary tumor. A total of 50 validated mutations were discovered within coding, RNA, or splice site sequences. Of these, 20 mutations were abundantly present in all three tumors, including mutations in CSMD1 and JAK2. These two genes subsequently were found to be mutated in other breast tumors. The metastasis contained two de novo mutations not present in the primary tumor, and was significantly enriched for 20 shared mutations, suggesting that they may be involved in the metastatic process. The xenograft contained no unique coding, RNA, or splice site mutations and retained all primary tumor mutations, albeit at different frequencies. However, a significant increase in copy number alterations was observed in the xenograft as compared to the primary tumor. We validated 28 large deletions and six inversions, as well as seven translocations in at least one of the three tumor samples. Among them, a 26 kb deletion in MECR was solely identified, assembled, and validated in the brain metastasis and two overlapping large deletions on chromosome 5 encompassing CTNNA1, a potential tumor suppressor gene, were identified in all three tumors. The differential mutation frequencies and structural variation patterns between primary and metastatic tumors suggest that metastatic tumors may arise from minor subpopulations of cells within the primary. Namely, the metastatic and xenografting processes apparently select for cells harboring a distinct subset of the primary tumor mutation repertoire.

  Study phs000245

• RNA seq on 19 samples of Radiation-Induced Meningiomas

  Purpose: Majority of pediatric cancers require the irradiation of the central nervous system (CNS), and as more patients survive into adulthood from improved oncological therapy the sequelae of brain radiation are increasing in prevalence. Radiation-induced meningiomas (RIMs), one such secondary effect, demonstrate a clinically more aggressive behaviour than sporadic meningiomas (SMs). We aimed to describe the genomic mutational landscape of RIMs.Methods: We analyzed a principal cohort of 18 RIMs, with 31 RIMs overall, from patients who received childhood radiation therapy and 30 SMs, as a comparator population. We performed a multiplatform integrative genomic analysis; including methylation, whole exome and RNA sequencing. Results: RIMs exhibited a five-fold increase in copy number alterations, commonly the loss of chromosome 1p (17/18 RIMs) and 22q (17/18 RIMs), which was significantly more than observed in sporadic meningiomas. Furthermore, RNA sequencing data revealed an NF2 gene fusion event in 35.3% of RIMs. In all 6 cases, there was a complete NF2 exon spliced into a complete exon of a reciprocal gene, suggesting that the breakpoints of genomic rearrangement are intronic. All tumours with the NF2 fusion also possessed monosomy of chromosome 22q, rendering the cells with homozygous disruption of NF2. Clinically, RIMs with the NF2 fusion exhibited ill-defined borders and a tendency to develop in anatomic frontal location. Also, targeted sequencing panel confirmed that RIMs had fewer nonsynonymous NF2 mutations (6.5% vs. 30% in SM) and absence of mutations in TRAF7, SMO, KLF4, PIK3CA and AKT1, genes traditionally involved in SMs.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that RIMs have distinct genomic drivers of oncogenesis as compared to SMs, specifically NF2 inactivation through fusion event. Radiation therapy possibly triggers genomic structural rearrangements through error-prone repair of double-stranded DNA breaks.

  Study EGAS00001002318

• RNA-Seq of Whole Blood from Patients with Intracranial Aneurysms

  Rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) causes intracranial hemorrhaging that leads to high rates of neurological deficits and death. Although rupture rates are low, clinicians must decide whether to treat or monitor these potentially dangerous lesions. In the current clinical practice, the most common metric to measure risk of rupture is aneurysm size. However, clinical data show that small aneurysms can also rupture. As a result, alternative clinical stratification scores have been proposed, including the PHASES (Population, Hypertension, Age, Size, Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage, and Site) score based on patient demographics and IA characteristics to stratify ruptured and unruptured IAs, and the Rupture Resemblance Score (RRS) that stratifies ruptured and unruptured IAs based on hemodynamic and morphological properties. However, all metrics require imaging on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which is invasive, expensive, requires the use of X-rays, and is associated with transient or permanent neurological and non-neurological complications. We hypothesize that individuals with dangerous IAs have detectable gene expression differences in their blood that could be used as biomarkers to determine rupture risk. We propose to use whole blood transcriptomes to develop a "one-stop" diagnostic test that can detect the presence of IAs and determine the risk of rupture based on circulating RNA expression biomarkers using our prototype AneuScreenTM platform. We aim to develop and validate biomarkers to predict risk, as calculated by the currently-used metric of aneurysm size, the clinical PHASES score, and the RRS. Here, we collected blood samples from consented individuals who were receiving cerebral imaging at the Gates Vascular Institute (Buffalo, NY) for intracranial aneurysm. RNA extracted from blood samples (n=43) was subjected to RNA-sequencing and added to our existing database (n=44). When combined with our previous data, we had transcriptome data from 68 aneurysms (after additional sample filtering). This dataset was stratified into low- and high-risk according to IA size, PHASES score, and RRS score. Differentially expressed genes were identified and used to construct predictive models. Fastq files and basic demographic information for the 43 newly-sequenced intracranial aneurysm samples on this project will be available through dbGaP.

  Study phs003072

• ICR_RNASeq_pHGG

  RNA sequencing of paediatric high grade gliomas and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. RNA was sequenced from fresh frozen surgical material or from primary cells cultured under stem cell conditions. RNA was subjected to Illumina whole transcriptome paired end sequencing. Data is provided as paired-end FASTQ files

  Dataset EGAD00001004116

• Whole-genome-sequencing, Whole-exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing in Sporadic ALS

  To identify the genetic cause and modifiers of Sporadic ALS, we performed Whole-genome-sequencing, Whole-exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing of Sporadic ALS patients.

  Study JGAS000393

• Integrated clinical, whole genome, and transcriptome analysis of multisampled lethal metastatic prostate cancer

  We report the first combined analysis of whole genome sequence, detailed clinical history, and transcriptome sequence of multiple prostate cancer metastases in a single patient (A21). Whole genome and transcriptome sequence was obtained from 9 anatomically separate metastases, and targeted DNA sequencing was performed in cancerous and noncancerous foci within the primary tumor specimen removed 5 years prior to death. Transcriptome analysis revealed increased expression of AR-regulated genes in liver metastases that harbored an AR p.L702H mutation, suggesting a dominant effect by the mutation despite being present in only 1 of an estimated 16 copies per cell. The metastases harbored several alterations to the PI3K/AKT pathway, including a clonal truncal mutation in PIK3CG and present in all metastatic sites studied. The list of truncal genomic alterations shared by all metastases included homozygous deletion of TP53, hemizygous deletion of RB1 and CHD1, and amplification of FGFR1. If the patient were treated today given this knowledge, use of second-generation androgen-directed therapies, cessation of glucocorticoid administration, and therapeutic inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway or FGFR1 receptor could provide personalized benefit. Three previously unreported truncal clonal missense mutations (ABCC4 p.R891L, ALDH9A1 p.W89R, and ASNA1 p.P75R) were expressed at the RNA level and assessed as druggable. The truncal status of mutations is critical for actionability, and can only be determined through analysis of multiple sites of metastasis. Our findings suggest that a large set of deeply analyzed cases could serve as powerful guide to more effective prostate cancer basic science and personalized cancer medicine clinical trials.

  Dataset EGAD00001001869

• BLUEPRINT: WGBS-seq for monocytes and neutrophils

  WGBS-seq for monocytes and neutrophils

  Dataset EGAD00001000673