5706 results for "canc*"

in 26.13 milliseconds.

• MutWP1: CRUK Grand Challenge Mutographs of Cancer: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma

  The Mutographs project aims to advance our understanding of the causes of cancer through studies of mutational signatures. Led by Mike Stratton, together with Paul Brennan, Ludmil Alexandrov, Allan Balmain, David Phillips and Peter Campbell, this large-scale international research endeavour was awarded a Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge. Different patterns of somatic mutation are generated by the different environmental, lifestyle and genetic factors that cause cancer, many of them are still unknown. Within Mutographs, the International Agency for Research on Cancer is coordinating the recruitment of 5000 individuals with cancer (colorectal, renal, pancreatic, oesophageal adenocarcinoma or oesophageal squamous cancers) across 5 continents to explore whether different mutational signatures explain marked variation in incidence. In brief, through an international network of collaborators around the world, biological materials are collected, along with demographic, histological, clinical and questionnaire data. Whole genome sequences of tumour-germline DNA pairs are generated at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (40X and 20X depth respectively). Somatic mutational signatures are subsequently extracted by non-negative matrix factorisation methods and correlated with risk factors data. Through an enhanced understanding of cancer aetiology, Mutographs unprecedented effort is anticipated to outline modifiable risk factors, lead to new approaches to prevent cancer, and provide opportunities to empower early detection, refine high-risk groups and contribute to further therapeutic development. This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2021-09-27.

  Dataset EGAD00001006083

• AT-AML samples dataset

  Serial samples from one AT-AML patient as described in publication Goldgraben et al Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2020. Whole exome sequencing of a AT-'germline' blood sample, one bone marrow sample (at AML diagnosis) and 3 AML blood samples. Library preped using the Illumina Nextera Rapid Capture Exome Enrichment Kit, and sequenced as PE150 on HiSeq4000. Provided: 5 BAM files (GRCh37); 2 VCF analyses (germline and somatic)

  Dataset EGAD00001006090

• Whole exome sequencing data from non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy prognosis

  The plasma samples and white blood cell samples were collected from 30 non-small-cell lung cancer patients and 3 healthy individuals. The solid tumor biopsy samples from 14 patients (a subset of the 30 patients) were collected. The cfDNA was extracted from their plasma samples using the QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit from QIAGEN (Germantown, MD). The cfDNA WES library was constructed with the SureSelect XT HS kit from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 10ng of cfDNA was used as input material. After end repair/dA-tailing of cfDNA, the adaptor was ligated. The ligation product was purified with Ampure XP beads (Beckman-Coulter, Atlanta, GA) and the adaptor-ligated library was amplified with index primer in 10-cycle PCR. The amplified library was purified again with Ampure XP beads, and the amount of amplified DNA was measured using the Qubit 1xdsDNA HS assay kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). 700-1000 ng of DNA sample was hybridized to the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 (Agilent) capture library and pulled down by streptavidin-coated beads. After washing the beads, the DNA library captured on the beads was re-amplified with 10-cycle PCR. The final libraries were purified by Ampure XP beads. The library concentration was measured by Qubit, and the quality was further examined with Agilent Bioanalyzer before the final step of 2x150bp paired-end sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq X10 platform (Illumina) at an average coverage of 200. Whole-exome capture libraries of genomic DNA of the 30 non-small cell lung cancer patients were constructed via Roche SeqCap EZ Exome V3 (Roche); whole-exome capture libraries of genomic DNA of the 3 healthy individuals were constructed via Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 (Agilent). Enriched exome libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform (Illumina) to generate 2x100bp paired-end reads at an average coverage of 200.

  Dataset EGAD00001006096

• sWGS of CRC patients

  Paired end (47/98) and single end (51/98) shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) data for the identification of somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) and the estimation of tumor fractions in plasma DNA of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

  Dataset EGAD00001006101

• Somatic mutation and clonal evolution in the human bladder_WGS (2020-05-05)

  In this study, we aim to characterise the landscape of mutation and clonal selection in the human bladder. The data in this study will be generated by whole-genome sequencing of laser-dissected microbiopsies from the bladder. The samples utilised in this study will include urothelium from transplant donors with no history of bladder cancer and cystectomy specimens from patients with bladder cancer. . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2020-05-05.

  Dataset EGAD00001006113

• WGS data of serially passaged TIC-enriched spheres of colorectal cancer

  WGS data of serially passaged TIC-enriched spheres of colorectal cancer

  Dataset EGAD00001006265

• Partner independent fusion gene detection by multiplexed CRISPR Cas9 enrichment and long read Nanopore sequencing (FUDGE)

  Targeted long-read nanopore sequencing. Abstract: Fusion genes are hallmarks of various cancer types and important determinants for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Fusion gene partner choice and breakpoint-position promiscuity restricts diagnostic detection, even for known and recurrent configurations. To accurately and impartially identify fusions, we developed FUDGE: FUsion Detection from Gene Enrichment. FUDGE couples target-selected and strand-specific CRISPR/Cas9 activity for fusion gene driver enrichment - without prior knowledge of fusion partner or breakpoint-location – to long-read Nanopore sequencing with the bioinformatics pipeline NanoFG. FUDGE has flexible target-loci choices and enables multiplexed enrichment for simultaneous analysis of several genes in multiple samples in one sequencing run. We observe on-average 665 fold breakpoint-site enrichment and identify nucleotide resolution fusion breakpoints - within two days. The assay identifies cancer cell line and tumor sample fusions irrespective of partner gene or breakpoint-position. FUDGE is a rapid and versatile fusion detection assay, providing unparalleled opportunity for diagnostic pan-cancer fusion detection.

  Dataset EGAD00001006111

• Somatic mutation and clonal evolution in the human bladder_TGS (2020-05-05)

  In this study, we aim to characterise the landscape of mutation and clonal selection in the human bladder. The study includes targeted sequencing of laser-dissected microbiopsies from the bladder. The samples utilised in this study will include urothelium from transplant donors with no history of bladder cancer and cystectomy specimens from patients with bladder cancer. . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2020-05-05.

  Dataset EGAD00001006114

• Somatic mutation and clonal evolution in the human bladder Novaseq (2020-05-05)

  In this study, we aim to characterise the landscape of mutation and clonal selection in the human bladder. The data in this study will be generated by whole-genome sequencing of laser-dissected microbiopsies from the bladder. The samples utilised in this study will include urothelium from transplant donors with no history of bladder cancer and cystectomy specimens from patients with bladder cancer. . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2020-05-05.

  Dataset EGAD00001006116

• Synchronous Colorectal Cancer genome sequencing

  Here, we performed a characterisation of 12 tumours and matched normal samples from 3 syCRC patients by whole genome sequencing: Patient A (tumours A1 and A2), Patient B (tumours B1-B5), and Patient C (tumours C1-C5). Somatic SNVs, indels and stuructural variants were called.

  Dataset EGAD00001006131