Login
Register
Need Help?
ABOUT
ABOUT THE EGA
EGA
Privacy Notice
Security
Team
STATISTICS
Bibliography
Growth
Community
Archive
Distribution
Catalog
PROJECTS AND FUNDERS
Projects
Funders
GA4GH
Federated EGA
Beacon
DISCOVERY
CATALOGUE
Studies
Datasets
DACs
Synthetic Data
METADATA
Search Box
Public Metadata API
SUBMISSION
DATA
File preparation
Uploading files
METADATA
EGA Schema
Sequencing & Phenotype
Submitter Portal
Submitter Portal API
Array
Programmatic Submission XML
ACCESS
DATA ACCESS COMMITTEE
What is a DAC?
Best Practices
DAC Portal
Data Use Conditions
REQUEST DATA
How to request data?
Quality Control Reports
DOWNLOAD
Metadata
Files
PyEGA3
Live Outbox
Visualisation
FUSE Client
EGA QuickView
Tips on how to search
DACs
EGAC00001000723
Data Access Committee for the Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH)
Request Access
This DAC controls 1 dataset
Dataset ID
Description
Technology
Samples
EGAD00001004066
We generated 42 human whole-exome sequencing data sets from fresh-frozen (FF) and FFPE samples. These samples include normal and tumor tissues from two different organs (liver and colon), that we extracted with three different FFPE extraction kits (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit and GeneRead DNA FFPE kit from Qiagen, Maxwell\textsuperscript{TM} RSC DNA FFPE Kit from Promega). Variant calling analysis shows a very high rate of concordance between matched FF / FFPE pairs and equivalent performance for the three kits we analyzed. We find a significant variation in the difference of total number of variants called between FF and FFPE samples for the three different FFPE DNA extraction kits. Coverage analysis shows that FFPE samples have less good indicators than FF samples, yet the coverage quality remains above accepted thresholds. We detect limited but significant variations in coverage indicator values between the three FFPE extraction kits. Globally, the GeneRead and QIAamp kits have better variant calling and coverage indicators than the Maxwell kit on the samples used in this study, although this kit performs better on some indicators and has advantages in terms of practical usage. Taken together, our results confirm the potential of FFPE samples analysis for clinical genomic studies, but also indicate that the choice of a FFPE DNA extraction kit should be done with careful testing and analysis beforehand in order to maximize the accuracy of the results.
Illumina HiSeq 2000
42